[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?
From: |
Tethys |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use? |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:51:17 +0000 |
Lyndon Nerenberg writes:
>As for internal locking, it's a toss-up between flock and lockf. To
>me the tie breaker is which of the two gets along best with network
>mounted filesystems these days (and think AFP and CIFS in addition
>to NFS).
In case anyone thinks this is hypothetical, it's not. Both my home
directory and my $MAIL are NFS mounted. I have no strong views on
which locking mechanism is used, so long as it doesn't break for
my setup.
Tet
- [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/02/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05