[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use? |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:25:13 -0500 |
> 1) System mailbox locking
>
> This must use the same scheme as the platform's /bin/mail and friends
> use.
In some cases, that's fcntl.
> The configure script needs to set the appropriate value based on
> the platform it's being run on.
configure can't do that unless it looks at all the applications
that might write to the mail spool.
> Configure also needs to determine
> whether inc needs setgid on that platform.
It already does.
> The user should never have to override these, and I don't think we
> should even provide a knob to let them to do so.
What if the user also uses an application that writes to the
mail spool but uses a different locking scheme than /bin/mail?
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Fellows, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?,
David Levine <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking - which to use?, David Levine, 2012/02/05