[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files
From: |
Tethys |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:12:09 +0000 |
Jerrad Pierce writes:
>An edge-case issue with @ be it in . ~/ or `mhpath +`
>is that it does not allow for multiple concurrent replies.
Hell, it's not even that much of an edge case. It's a reasonably
common situation, and it silently fails by simply relinking the
@ for each new reply. Unless anyone has any strong rationale for
keeping it around (and I haven't seen any posted here so far),
I'm all in favour of nuking it altogether.
Tet
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, paul vixie, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Paul Fox, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, paul vixie, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Jerrad Pierce, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Jerrad Pierce, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Paul Fox, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files,
Tethys <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Paul Fox, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Jerrad Pierce, 2012/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Paul Fox, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files, Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15