Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files

[Paul Fox]

ken wrote:
 > >Hell, it's not even that much of an edge case. It's a reasonably common
 > >situation, and it silently fails by simply relinking the @ for each new
 > >reply. Unless anyone has any strong rationale for keeping it around (and
 > >I haven't seen any posted here so far), I'm all in favour of nuking it
 > >altogether.
 > 
 > I am loath to get rid of an interface like this that has been around
 > forever (and like Valdis said, exmh might use it).  AFAICT, this has
 > only come up as an issue because of dropbox, and I think having a switch
 > to turn it off might be the right solution here.

i agree.  i've never had a use for @, and i almost said "nuke it"
earlier today, but adding an option to suppress it would be the right
choice.

paul

=---------------------
 paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 32.4 degrees)