[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was
From: |
Jon Steinhart |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given. |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:23:10 -0700 |
address@hidden writes:
> --==_Exmh_1331860781_2149P
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:02:48 PDT, Jon Steinhart said:
>
> > And yes, having defaults for common content types in the profile would
> > be a good thing. At the time that I wrote this stuff suffixes were not
> > nearly as standardized as they are today.
>
> Wow. Maybe somebody should gather them all up into a file and call
> it /etc/mime.types or something, so all programs could benefit?
>
> </snark>
Whoa, sarcasm. It's SOOOOOO appreciated :)
This all goes back to the "don't break things" approach that I took when I
wrote this originally. Maybe it's time to revisit it. It's a complex issue
because of the linkage between mime types and helper applications. I used
what was there which comes from mhshow. No real objection to changing it
althout /etc/mime.types may not exist on all systems. Also, there are
probably considerable differences in choices of helper applications.
Jon
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ronald F. Guilmette, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ronald F. Guilmette, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Valdis . Kletnieks, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given.,
Jon Steinhart <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ronald F. Guilmette, 2012/03/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Bill Wohler, 2012/03/25