Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given.

[Lyndon Nerenberg]

On 2012-03-15, at 6:50 PM, Jon Steinhart wrote:

> Are you suggesting having a header like nmh-attachment which is 
> rfc-problematic
> or just that we change the MH to NMH?

x-* is dead. If we're going to abuse the header namespace for things that 
trigger nmh-specific functionality, let's at least put them in a namespace that 
we can succinctly document as "these are not real rfc2822 messages headers; 
instead they trigger internal nmh actions."