Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was

nmh-workers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was

From:	Bill Wohler
Subject:	Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given.
Date:	Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:45:11 -0700
User-agent:	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)

Lyndon Nerenberg <address@hidden> writes:

> On 2012-03-15, at 6:37 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
>
>> With X-MH-Attachment?
>
> Could we please use nmh-* for this stuff?  Just to make it clear this is 
> nmh-specific?

Well, what if GNU Mailutils folks buy these changes? Then they would
have to change the header fields to mailutils-* which would be annoying.
Worse, it would then make the header fields incompatible when in fact
they would be compatible.

What is the harm in using MH-*?

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> aka <address@hidden>
http://www.newt.com/wohler/
GnuPG ID:610BD9AD

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., (continued)

Prev by Date: Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given.
Next by Date: Re: [Nmh-workers] temporary files
Previous by thread: Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given.
Next by thread: Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread