[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for
From: |
JerryHeyman |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID? |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 21:33:55 -0400 |
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:55:10 -0400, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
> I see from your later message you found the -msgid flag in your .mh_profile,
> so skipping over that ...
>
> >>> BTW, while I am looking at this, it seems even more bizarre that
> >>> LocaleName will apply "localdomain" even when it's ignoring "localname".
> >
> >> Not at all; if localname is unqualified, then it makes perfect sense
> >> to append localdomain.
> >
> >But does the same apply to the result of getaddrinfo? Hard to tell.
>
> Hrm. I guess I hadn't completely thought about the implications
> of how localdomain was implemented; I didn't really think about the
> issue of LocalName(0) versus LocalName(1). But your point is well
> taken; it doesn't really make sense to apply localdomain to both,
> does it? I think that if you're using localname you would be
> expected to supply a FQDN, and localdomain should only apply in the
> LocalName(1) case.
>
> My gut feeling is that localdomain is so rarely used nowadays that
> it's not worth fixing it for 1.5. Thoughts from anyone else? For
> post-1.5 I'd be fine with either using localdomain for only the
> LocalName(1) case or junking support for it completely. Or perhaps
> doing something else altogether. Thoughts?
fwiw, I've always used a localname entry in my mts.conf file.
Whether I need to or not, I don't know - it might be ancient voodoo that
I've never updated.
I do know that I needed it when I wanted to use address@hidden as
my return address rather than address@hidden - as the
machine name isn't exposed to the internet, but my domainname is.
This has changed a bit over the years because providers have stopped
allowing open relays (which is a good thing). Now I have had to
enable masquerade and adding a ReplyTo: line to each of the components.
I liked it better 20yrs ago when the internet was a much kinder
gentler place :-)
>
> --Ken
jerry
--
// Jerry Heyman | "Three types of people spend other
// Amigan Forever :-) | peoples money: Children, criminals,
\\ // heymanj at acm dot org | and politicians. And they all require
\X/ http://www.hobbeshollow.com | adult supervision" - Dick Armey
- [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Tom Lane, 2012/06/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/06
Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?, Kevin Cosgrove, 2012/06/06