[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names
From: |
valdis . kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:21:42 -0400 |
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:02:30 -0400, Ken Hornstein said:
> Here's an alternate question: I was thinking of deprecating MM_CHARSET in
> the future. Would anyone object?
No problem here, I heaved it over the side in my config about 4 years ago.
Certainly
too late to toss it for 1.5, but 1.6 would be OK.
Should we ship 1.5 with a "heads up, changes contemplated for the next release"
list, so people can start thinking ahead and/or commenting?
pgpfw4QS6BJ_S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Oliver Kiddle, 2012/06/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/11