[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:34:13 -0400 |
>Should we ship 1.5 with a "heads up, changes contemplated for the next release"
>list, so people can start thinking ahead and/or commenting?
We already have a list like that for 1.5, but I think it's too late for
MM_CHARSET for this release. Maybe mark it as deprecated for 1.6 (or whatever)
and then remove it for the release after that?
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Oliver Kiddle, 2012/06/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Tethys, 2012/06/10