[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject)
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject) |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Aug 2014 16:22:16 +0100 |
Hi Jerrad,
> > This allows a user reading the email in an MUA that's not
> > MIME-capabable to come across the simplest format first, e.g.
> > text/plain.
>
> That's the theory, but many senders use a text/plain part akin to "If
> you cannot read this, get a better MUA"
Agreed, but I was trying to explain why nmh has made its choices. :-)
I quite often find both text/plain and text/html parts populated with
content, but differing content because someone hasn't updated both
templates in step. Another common fault is text/plain containing chunks
of CSS and HTML as if some incomplete substitution aiming to strip HTML
has been run on the HTML part.
So I pick and choose what part(s) to read based on my trust/experience
of the source. :-(
Cheers, Ralph.