[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address
From: |
Andy Bradford |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address |
Date: |
1 Sep 2015 12:50:37 -0600 |
Thus said Lyndon Nerenberg on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:37:55 -0700:
> Maybe you should file a bug report with the offender?
One of the biggest offenders is Microsoft Exchange. When it has a
distribution list name made up with dots, it does not quote them. So you
end up with:
dl.name <address@hidden>
And of course nmh complains. I'm not faulting nmh in this case because
there isn't a more blatant disregard of the RFC than this, but does
anyone have way to submit bug reports to Microsoft regarding this?
Thanks,
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000000055e5f3a1
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address,
Andy Bradford <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Robert Elz, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Jeffrey Honig, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Robert Elz, 2015/09/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/09/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Andy Bradford, 2015/09/02