[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address
From: |
Christian Neukirchen |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 2015 18:19:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>>That means your From: (and my From:...) should not have been generated
>>anymore, because we have two unquoted words in front of the angle-addr?
>
> Ralph didn't include the full RFC grammar, but here are the rules in
> relatively plain English:
>
> - A "modern" email address is an optional 'display-name' followed by an
> email address surrounded by angle brackets (<>).
> - A 'display-name' is really a 'phrase'
> - A 'phrase' is one or more 'word' (or an 'obs-phrase', obsolete phrase).
Ok, I misunderstood the 1* then. Thanks for the explanation. :)
--
Christian Neukirchen <address@hidden> http://chneukirchen.org
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Andy Bradford, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Robert Elz, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Jeffrey Honig, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Robert Elz, 2015/09/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address, Ken Hornstein, 2015/09/03