Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?

[Paul Fox]

address@hidden wrote:
 > On Sat, 06 Jan 2018 00:19:31 +0000, Ralph Corderoy said:
 > 
 > > That quickly bores.  -noprint doesn't seem a good fit for a general
 > > `please be quiet'.  If folder's regaining that functionality then
 > > perhaps it's the opportunity to use a more general, positive rather than
 > > negative, option?  Especially if it has an often unambiguous
 > > abbreviation.
 > 
 > -silent?

i guess i don't think -noprint is so bad.  it's pretty much self-explanatory,
and has never worked in the past (so we wouldn't be breaking anything).

paul
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 0.5 degrees)