[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work? |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jan 2018 15:00:34 +0000 |
Hi Paul,
> > so `-nopri' would be needed to be unambiguous if it were to become
> > the common option across nmh commands. That's tedious, and doesn't
> > obviously say `be quiet', ending in an `eye' sound, not an `ee', so
> > the `...nt' would be added anyway.
>
> you kind of lost me in that last bit, but i'll take your word for it.
> ;-)
I mean, I'd read `pri' as sounding like the start of priority, not
print.
> but i don't think i'll hold up actually implementing -noprint, for the
> folder command, on the development branch.
Sure, I'm not an arbiter, just opinionated so did some research. :-)
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, David Levine, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, David Levine, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, valdis . kletnieks, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] does "folder +inbox -noprint" work?, Paul Fox, 2018/01/09