[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:01:58 +0000 |
Hi Andy,
To recap, the previous mailing-list discussion was around
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2018-01/msg00130.html
and
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2018-01/msg00126.html
The former's suggestion, with correction, got committed as 695ed941.
> if [ $iconv_elides_question_marks -eq 1 ]; then
> check "$expected" "$actual"
> else
> grep "Can't convert .*us-ascii to UTF-8" "$actual" >/dev/null ||
> failed=1
> fi
>
> It enters the else because iconv_elides_question_marks was previously
> set to 0 and never altered thereafter.
That's this early part. Does it attempt the printf? If so,
$ICONV_ENABLED isn't 0, and iconv(1) quite reasonably disliked
converting from `?UTF-8'.
iconv_elides_question_marks=0
if test "$ICONV_ENABLED" -eq 0; then
text_size=10
else
text_size=11
#### The GNU iconv library normalises charset names by eliding '?',
along
#### with some other characters. The iconv library used on
FreeBSD/NetBSD
#### doesn't.
printf x | iconv -f '?UTF-8' -t UTF-8 >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
iconv_elides_question_marks=1
fi
> So, why does it expect an error in $actual under these conditions?
...
> $ cat $MHTMPDIR/inbox/$msgnum
> Subject: invalid parameter value charset
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset*=invalid''%0Dus-ascii
It expects an error because the charset is invalid. The parameter's
value is in the `invalid' character set, with no specified language, and
it is a carriage return followed by `us-ascii'.
Because iconv_elides_question_marks is 0 it's expected that iconv will
choke on the parameter, giving an error message to be found by the grep.
> $ env | grep LC
(locale(1) is a better test because there's $LANG too.)
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/01/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/01/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/01/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, David Levine, 2018/01/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/01/30
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ralph Corderoy, 2018/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Ken Hornstein, 2018/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/01/31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Where are we at for 1.7.1?, Andy Bradford, 2018/01/31