[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix
From: |
Lorenzo Pattarini |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:56:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux i686; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 |
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #46639 (project octave):
Good afternoon!
Well, I can reproduce it in each octave session I try to execute, but I don't
succed in redirecting the output on file!
I tried to use diary but octave doesn't save in diary all the output I see, I
also tried to make a little script and running it from command line but I
don't obtain any bad result.
For better understanding I attach the following files:
* item 1 file "diary":
I opened octave, digited " diary on " and then copied and pasted the
following
function:
+ verbatim +
function [ I ] = openNC(f,a,b,n,dec)
if(n<0 || n>4)
disp("Error!");
endif
Nc_coeff = [ 1, 0, 0, 0;
1, 1, 0, 0;
2, -1, 2, 0;
11, 1, 1, 11 ];
h = (b-a)/(n+2);
coeff = [2*h, 3*h/2, 4*h/3, 5*h/24];
x = a+h:h:a+(n+1)*h;
I = 0;
for i=1:n+1
I = I + coeff(n+1)*Nc_coeff(n+1,i)*f(x(i));
endfor
endfunction
- verbatim -
* item 2 file "octaveOutputPaste":
a copy of octave's terminal output after trying to define the function
openNC.
It doesn't allow me to scoll up all the terminal output 'cause it's too
long.
I have same behave either if I try to define function or if I just define the
matrix itself, so I attach also the
* item 3 file "justMatrixDefinition": I opened octave, digited diary on and
then paste the following code:
+ verbatim +
Nc_coeff = [ 1, 0, 0, 0;
1, 1, 0, 0;
2, -1, 2, 0;
11, 1, 1, 11 ];
- verbatim -
thanks again for helping!
(file #35674, file #35675, file #35676)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: diary Size:0 KB
File name: octaveOutputPaste Size:54 KB
File name: justMatrixDefinition Size:0 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46639>
_______________________________________________
Messaggio inviato con/da Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, anonymous, 2015/12/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, Mike Miller, 2015/12/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix,
Lorenzo Pattarini <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, Doug Stewart, 2015/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, Lorenzo Pattarini, 2015/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, Mike Miller, 2015/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, Avinoam Kalma, 2015/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, Lorenzo Pattarini, 2015/12/09
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #46639] Bad interpretation of integer matrix, Mike Miller, 2015/12/09