[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47363] nonlin_residmin: precision? ("optim" p
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47363] nonlin_residmin: precision? ("optim" package) |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:56:41 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47363>
Summary: nonlin_residmin: precision? ("optim" package)
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Di 08 Mär 2016 15:56:40 UTC
Category: Octave Forge Package
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Inaccurate Result
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name: Michael
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 4.0.0
Operating System: Microsoft Windows
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Hello,
I tinkered with the nonlin_residmin function from the "optim" package. My goal
was to find the roots of a simple function; f(x) = x^2-2*x-5
Since nonlin-residmin uses residual minimisation, I did not define a cost
function and just defined f(x) as:
function out = f(x)
out = x^2-2*x-5;
endfunction
1. One root of this function is at approx. x_root = 3.45, while its absolute
minimum is located at x_min = 1. When using x0=1.1 as a starting point,
nonlin_residmin finds the actual root at 3.45 (since the residual is almost
zero in this place).
2. When I use 1.0001 as the starting point, the residual shown is 6. However
this is f(x_min) and therefore the absolute minimum of the function but not
even close to either of the roots.
What I am wondering about is if nonlin_residmin already has problems because
of the gradient at 1.0001 being close to zero? One would expect that 1e-5
should not be an issue in terms of machine precision?
An example file is attached to this post. I am running Octave 4.0.0 on 64bit
Windows 7.
_______________________________________________________
File Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Di 08 Mär 2016 15:56:40 UTC Name: test.m Size: 390B By: None
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=36571>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47363>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47363] nonlin_residmin: precision? ("optim" package),
anonymous <=