[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails f
From: |
Liang Tang |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63286] [octave forge] (optim) fmincon fails for Rosenbrock example |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 07:17:05 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #15, bug #63286 (project octave):
Hi Arun, I have a bug unrelated question. This item must have been discussed
many times in the past. But to modify a code taken from someone else to work
in pararrayfun and paracellfun require significantly lot more work than
changing 'for' to 'parfor' plus some array/matrix allocation. So I am
interested in the feasibility.
This is from the command line help of parfor:
*Warning:* parallel processing pools are currently unimplemented in
Octave; 'parfor' currently behaves exactly as a normal 'for' loop.
How can I pull a request to make Octave parfor works like a Matlab parfor?
Thanks,
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63286>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/