[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GSoC] JSON Test suite status
From: |
Andreas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: [GSoC] JSON Test suite status |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:37:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 |
Am 22.06.20 um 11:30 schrieb Abdallah Elshamy:
> a.("123foo") or a.("foo bar")
you also create it this way. Kais example:
octave:3> my_struct.("2bad_fieldname") = 4
my_struct =
scalar structure containing the fields:
2bad_fieldname = 4
> I think this is not a common way to access structs so it may be better
> to use makeValidName despite it is not necessary to call it to create
> structs in Octave unlike MATLAB. What do you think?
I think the goal for most users will be, that the code written for the
other software also works on GNU Octave. So I would suggest to use the
same "renaming" conventions.
-- Andy
- JSON Test suite status, Abdallah Elshamy, 2020/06/21
- Re: [GSoC] JSON Test suite status, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/06/22
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andreas Weber, 2020/06/22
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Abdallah Elshamy, 2020/06/22
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andrew Janke, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andrew Janke, 2020/06/23