[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JSON Test suite status
From: |
Andreas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: JSON Test suite status |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:02:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 |
Am 23.06.20 um 07:43 schrieb Andrew Janke:
> On 6/23/20 1:25 AM, Andreas Weber wrote:
>> Am 22.06.20 um 19:47 schrieb Abdallah Elshamy:
>>> Thanks for providing feedback. This script is intended to run on MATLAB
>>> to test compatibility so producing the same output in it is a core goal
>>> of it.
>>
>> Just to be clear: You want to create byte-identical JSON output which
>> possibly means patching/modifying rapidjson?
>>
> "Patching/modifying rapidjson" sounds a little extreme here: the compact
> "minified" form that Matlab's jsonencode produces is probably achievable
> without such extreme measures. It's just all whitespace elided. (Whether
> this can be practically achieved without violating the Matlab license is
> another question.)
Yes, you are right. I should have written: "modifying rapidjsons output
to byte-match MATLABs JSON output".
Btw, does the other software product has a "pretty" output like rapidjson?
-- Andy
- JSON Test suite status, Abdallah Elshamy, 2020/06/21
- Re: [GSoC] JSON Test suite status, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/06/22
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andreas Weber, 2020/06/22
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Abdallah Elshamy, 2020/06/22
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andrew Janke, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Kai Torben Ohlhus, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andrew Janke, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andreas Weber, 2020/06/23
- Re: JSON Test suite status, Andrew Janke, 2020/06/23