[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [paragui-users] Good day! ParaGUI-CVS nice by the way
From: |
Alexander Pipelka |
Subject: |
Re: [paragui-users] Good day! ParaGUI-CVS nice by the way |
Date: |
28 May 2002 22:42:00 +0200 |
Am Die, 2002-05-28 um 22.44 schrieb Eric Ross:
> Mensaje citado por Teunis Peters <address@hidden>:
>
> > Some updates from what I've worked with lately:
> > - pgmpeg doesn't link (even with CVS updates) on my system for some
> > reason. So I rewrote a version that wasn't decended from the MPEG class.
>
> I had a similar problem time ago. It didnt link, and complains about problems
> with rtti. After i recompiled paragui and smpeg with the same rtti flags it
> linked happily.
Yes. But the problem is that some precompiled versions (e.g. Mandrake)
are compiled *without* RTTI.
> Well, sometime ago someone point me to "why not derive the pgmpeg class from
> the
> MPEG class?". Good!, the pgmpeg class became simpler, and i didnt requiere to
> duplicate every method in the MPEG class. I think that you could try the rtti
> tip, and if it doesnt work, well, lets talk :)
>
> > Anyone want a slight variation of pgmpeg for current (CVS) paragui?
> > Also it's got added 'slot' support for some functions already...
>
> What do you mean with "slot support" ? :-? sigc++ ?
Seems so :))
Yes. The development branch (1.1.x) is using libsigc++ for callbacks.
Alex