[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Protux-devel] Proposition : no more non-stable releases
From: |
Remon Sijrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Protux-devel] Proposition : no more non-stable releases |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:20:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
> > Normal User --> last stable release
> > More courageous user -> nightly cvs tarball
> > Insane tester -> cvs checkout
>
> in fact there is not big difference between downloading a nightly cvs
> tarball or direct cvs checkout. In both case you are never sure if the code
> is in a compilable state. The only difference is that in the first case you
> don't need to know anything about cvs, which can be a good thing so more
> people can test.
Yes indeed, the intermediate releases were releases which were known to
compile without problems.
So making a CVS tarball should only be done if the CVS tree is relatively
stable, so users can indeed test, instead of updating to CVS from time to
time without knowing if it is compilable or has huge bugs in it.
After all, it seems that the intermediate releases were not so bad at all ;-)
Greets,
Remon