[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Protux-devel] Protux (CVS) working again,
From: |
Reinhard Amersberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Protux-devel] Protux (CVS) working again, |
Date: |
Sat, 29 May 2004 14:01:52 +0200 |
address@hidden schrieb am 29.05.04 04:42:45:
>
> > btw - do you need more infos?
>
> Actually, I lost the point. What was the problem again? :-)
:-) no problem ... MADM (hw) seems to detect available busses, but I can not
select them in the bus select dialog [BN] or [VB]
> It would be really handy if I can talk live to you by using IRC, or some
> messenger.
I've setup an irc account some MONTH ago, but haven't used very much, so I will
re-check if it is still active ...
> I looked at your debug logs, but everything seems normal,
really? AFAIR MADM detects the available busse correctly,
| | | | | [ Probing valid modes for bus hw:0,0 ... ]
| | | | | [ Trying 22050 Hz MONO 16 bits : OK ]
| | | | | [ Trying 32000 Hz MONO 16 bits : OK ]
| | | | | [ Trying 44100 Hz MONO 16 bits : OK ]
... but some lines below
| | | | | | [ --- Summary of all valid bus for this project ( 44100
Hz , STEREO, 16 bits --- ]
| | | | | | [ --- Buses not listed on this summary will be disable
for this project --- ]
... it shows that there are NO available busses, right?
btw - did you received the mail, about forum stuff some personal info ;-), I've
send to you yesterday?
I ask this dumb question cause my mail client (kmail), or maybe my mail account
for general, has a strange behaviour from time to time just like
- crashing after sending a message; after re-opening the client the mail is
located in the output folder, but seems to be send, cause I get a reply from
protux-devel list
- some, not all, already send (to protux-devel list for example) mails arrived
sometimes with a big delay of up to 3 days
- also some messages that a answer has arrived to a topic at mustux-forum has
sometimes a big delay as well
greetings
reinhard
so I can't give any
> help right now.
>
> Remon
>
>
> >
> > greetings
> > reinhard
> >
> > > Best wishes,
> > >
> > > Remon
> > >
> > > > greetings
> > > > reinhard
> > > >
> > > > address@hidden, address@hidden schrieb am 25.05.04
> 00:27:29:
> > > > > Am Monday 24 May 2004 19:29 schrieb Remon Sijrier:
> > > > > > > hw detects just a few sample rates whereby plughw detects ALL to
> > > > > > > be usable for protux, which cannot be possible as far as I
> > > > > > > understand ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > plughw is a software layer which converts any used sample rate /
> > > > > > bitdepth to a sample rate / bitdepth the audio card can handle, so
> > > > > > yes, even if you want to record/play in 64 bit, 192 kHz it is
> > > > > > supported, but the actual values are bound by what your audiocard
> > > > > > supports.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > also no MTA is created when using plughw.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sounds strange, maybe I can get a clue when you send the output.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Success,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Remon
> > > > >
> > > > > ok, so please examine the attached files and good luck!
> > > > >
> > > > > greetings
> > > > > reinhard
> > > > >
> > > > > <hr>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Protux-devel mailing list
> > > > > address@hidden
> > > > > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Protux-devel mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Protux-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Protux-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Protux-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
- Re: [Protux-devel] Protux (CVS) working again,, Reinhard Amersberger, 2004/05/24
- Re: [Protux-devel] Protux (CVS) working again,, Reinhard Amersberger, 2004/05/26
- Re: [Protux-devel] Protux (CVS) working again,, Reinhard Amersberger, 2004/05/26
- Re: [Protux-devel] Protux (CVS) working again,, Reinhard Amersberger, 2004/05/27
- Re: [Protux-devel] Protux (CVS) working again,,
Reinhard Amersberger <=