Re: non-recursive automake

[John Darrington]

On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:29:56AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
     
     > That said, the non-recursive automake seems to be working fine at the
     > moment (at least for me).
     
     One thing that worries me about the non-recursive automake is
     that, at least for me, it's sticking all of the object files in
     the root of the build tree.  That implies that we can't have both
     foo/bar.c and quux/bar.c, because their object file names would
     conflict.  I don't much like that, if so.
     

Indeed!  That has been worrying me too.  There is a nobase_ prefix
available for some of the variables, but it doesn't seem to work with
SOURCES.  Perhaps I'll ask about this on the mailing list.

J'

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.

pgp4GdCnKPMWV.pgp
Description: PGP signature