[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem editing file
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Problem editing file |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:34:38 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Michel Boaventura <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm part of the dev-mingw list. If you don't mind, I can forward your
> message to they. I already open a threat about it.
A "thread", I hope. Yes, please forward my email, that's fine.
> But my question is: if POSIX tells one thing, and Microsoft tells
> another, mingw should use what implementation?
I think that the goal of Mingw is to make it easy to port GNU
software to Windows. If I am correct about that goal, then Mingw
should use the POSIX definition, because that definition makes it
easier to port GNU software to Windows than if Mingw used
Microsoft's definition.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/19
- Re: Problem editing file, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/19
- Re: Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/19
- Re: Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/19
- Re: Problem editing file, John Darrington, 2009/03/19
- Re: Problem editing file, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file, John Darrington, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/20
- Re: Problem editing file, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/21
- Re: Problem editing file, Michel Boaventura, 2009/03/21