|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/10] qtest: add support for -M pc |
Date: | Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:29:27 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 |
On 02/25/2012 03:21 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 25.02.2012 22:12, schrieb Anthony Liguori:On 02/25/2012 02:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:On 02/25/2012 08:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:This involves replacing the local APIC with the qtest interrupt controller. It should be pretty straight forward to do the same for other machine types. Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori<address@hidden> --- hw/pc_piix.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/pc_piix.c b/hw/pc_piix.c index 5e11d15..2c0881e 100644 --- a/hw/pc_piix.c +++ b/hw/pc_piix.c @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_XEN # include<xen/hvm/hvm_info_table.h> #endif +#include "qtest.h" #define MAX_IDE_BUS 2 @@ -212,6 +213,8 @@ static void pc_init1(MemoryRegion *system_memory, i8259 = kvm_i8259_init(isa_bus); } else if (xen_enabled()) { i8259 = xen_interrupt_controller_init(); + } else if (qtest_enabled()) { + i8259 = qtest_interrupt_controller_init(); } else { cpu_irq = pc_allocate_cpu_irq(); i8259 = i8259_init(isa_bus, cpu_irq[0]);This is not needed anymore.Why? This is necessary for IRQ to work. You mean, if you use irq_intercept, this isn't needed?The reason for Paolo's RFC was to _avoid_ having to touch every target with code such as the above, no?
I misunderstood. I thought irq_intercept was intercepting the RTC IRQ. I now see it's intercepting the I/O APIC irqs.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
Andreas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |