qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add the NVMM acceleration enlightenments


From: Kamil Rytarowski
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add the NVMM acceleration enlightenments
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:31:08 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1

On 06.02.2020 14:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Kamil Rytarowski <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On 03.02.2020 12:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>> @@ -2029,6 +2072,19 @@ static void qemu_whpx_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>>   #endif
>>>>>   }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void qemu_nvmm_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    char thread_name[VCPU_THREAD_NAME_SIZE];
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    cpu->thread = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuThread));
>>>>> +    cpu->halt_cond = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuCond));
>>>>
>>>> Nitpick, we prefer g_new0().
>>>
>>> In this file other qemu_*_start_vcpu() use  g_malloc0().
>>>
>>> I will leave this part unchanged and defer tor future style fixups if
>>> someone is interested.
>>
>> Time to re-run Coccinelle with the semantic patch from commit
>> b45c03f585e.
>
> I thought about it, but then noticed it would be clever to modify
> checkpatch to refuse 'g_malloc0?(.*sizeof.*);'
>
>

As the patchset was reviewed, could we please merge it in the current
(v3) form (*) please?

Feel free to fixup the style after that as you like.

We plan to release NetBSD 9.0 in 1-2 weeks unless there will be a delay.

https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/second_final_release_candidate_for

(*) https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-02/msg01405.html



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]