qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add the NVMM acceleration enlightenments


From: Kamil Rytarowski
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] Add the NVMM acceleration enlightenments
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:59:08 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1

On 06.02.2020 17:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 2/6/20 4:38 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 06.02.2020 15:13, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Kamil Rytarowski <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 06.02.2020 14:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:06 PM Markus Armbruster
>>>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> Kamil Rytarowski <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03.02.2020 12:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>>>>>>> @@ -2029,6 +2072,19 @@ static void
>>>>>>>>> qemu_whpx_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>>>>>>    #endif
>>>>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +static void qemu_nvmm_start_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>> +    char thread_name[VCPU_THREAD_NAME_SIZE];
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>> +    cpu->thread = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuThread));
>>>>>>>>> +    cpu->halt_cond = g_malloc0(sizeof(QemuCond));
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nitpick, we prefer g_new0().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In this file other qemu_*_start_vcpu() use  g_malloc0().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will leave this part unchanged and defer tor future style
>>>>>>> fixups if
>>>>>>> someone is interested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Time to re-run Coccinelle with the semantic patch from commit
>>>>>> b45c03f585e.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought about it, but then noticed it would be clever to modify
>>>>> checkpatch to refuse 'g_malloc0?(.*sizeof.*);'
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As the patchset was reviewed, could we please merge it in the current
>>>> (v3) form (*) please?
>>>
>>> No objection.  If I wanted you to clean this up before we accept your
>>> work, I would've told you :)
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I see. I don't own myself a merge queue so I depend on yours.
>
> As you said [*] you'd love to have this feature in NetBSD 9.0, no
> objection neither. You still need some X86 specialist to review patch 3.
> The usual reviewers Paolo/Eduardo/Richard are currently very busy.
>
> Also while I'd love to use this feature to be able to regularly run QEMU
> CI on NetBSD, I don't have time to test it on a bare metal hardware :|
> Maybe do you know someone from the NetBSD community who already did?
>
> [*] https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg676199.html
>
>

I'm going to find a person to test it and submit "Tested-by:".



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]