qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] vTPM for aarch64


From: Auger Eric
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] vTPM for aarch64
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:17:11 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0

Hi Stefan,

On 2/26/20 9:01 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 2/26/20 1:18 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On 2/26/20 6:53 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>> On 2/26/20 12:47 PM, Auger Eric wrote:
>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>
>>>> On 2/26/20 2:32 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>>>> On 2/26/20 5:25 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>>>> This series adds the capability to instantiate an MMIO TPM TIS
>>>>>> in ARM virt. It is candidate to qemu 5.0.
>>>>> Looks good. Can you run the checkpatch script over the patches and
>>>>> address the warnings?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thank you for you review!
>>>>
>>>> About warnings
>>>>
>>>> - There are warnings due to new files added but I think they all
>>>> have an
>>>> entry in MAINTAINERS as wildcards are used.
>>>>
>>>> - In tpm: Add the SysBus TPM TIS device.
>>>>     There is line over 80 chars but I think it is fine
>>>>
>>>> #define TPM_TIS_SYSBUS(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(TPMStateSysBus, (obj),
>>>> TYPE_TPM_TIS_SYSBUS)
>>>
>>> Ok, leave it as it is.
>> and sorry, what about the comment style issues derived from existing
>> files?
>>
>> "
>> - test: tpm-tis: Get prepared to share tests between ISA and sysbus
>> devices
>> has lots of warnings due to old comment style being used in
>> tests/qtest/tpm-tis-test.c. I did not fix the style issue because I just
>> copy the code into tpm-tis-util.c
>>
>> Do you want me to fix them in the same patch, in a separate patch or
>> ignore the style issue for now?
> 
> 
> if you could fix them that would be great...

Sure, I will fix them.

Thanks

Eric
> 
> 
>> "
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>>
>>>     Stefan
>>>
>>>
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]