[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 04/12] qmp: Assert that no other monitor is active
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 04/12] qmp: Assert that no other monitor is active |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:57:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
> monitor_qmp_dispatch() is never supposed to be called in the context of
> another monitor, so assert that monitor_cur() is NULL instead of saving
> and restoring it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> monitor/qmp.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/monitor/qmp.c b/monitor/qmp.c
> index 5e9abd4711..a04c512e3a 100644
> --- a/monitor/qmp.c
> +++ b/monitor/qmp.c
> @@ -135,16 +135,15 @@ static void monitor_qmp_respond(MonitorQMP *mon, QDict
> *rsp)
>
> static void monitor_qmp_dispatch(MonitorQMP *mon, QObject *req)
> {
> - Monitor *old_mon;
> QDict *rsp;
> QDict *error;
>
> - old_mon = monitor_cur();
> + assert(monitor_cur() == NULL);
I'd write !monitor_cur(). Matter of taste.
> monitor_set_cur(&mon->common);
>
> rsp = qmp_dispatch(mon->commands, req, qmp_oob_enabled(mon));
>
> - monitor_set_cur(old_mon);
> + monitor_set_cur(NULL);
>
> if (mon->commands == &qmp_cap_negotiation_commands) {
> error = qdict_get_qdict(rsp, "error");
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v6 04/12] qmp: Assert that no other monitor is active,
Markus Armbruster <=