[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] memory: assert and define MemoryRegionOps callbacks
|
From: |
P J P |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] memory: assert and define MemoryRegionOps callbacks |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2020 19:13:12 +0530 (IST) |
+-- On Thu, 13 Aug 2020, David Gibson wrote --+
| The overall idea seems fine. Looks like we could avoid a fair bit of
| boilerplate - and slightly reduce our binary size - by introducing a global
| unimplemented_write() function.
* You mean for after this assert(3) in memory_region_init_io change is merged?
This series attempts to define all missing r/w calls.
* There are also unassigned_mem_read/write functions, maybe those can be
reused?
Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
8685 545E B54C 486B C6EB 271E E285 8B5A F050 DE8D
- [PATCH v4 5/9] nvram: add nrf51_soc flash read method, (continued)
- [PATCH v4 5/9] nvram: add nrf51_soc flash read method, P J P, 2020/08/11
- [PATCH v4 6/9] spapr_pci: add spapr msi read method, P J P, 2020/08/11
- [PATCH v4 7/9] tz-ppc: add dummy read/write methods, P J P, 2020/08/11
- [PATCH v4 8/9] imx7-ccm: add digprog mmio write method, P J P, 2020/08/11
- [PATCH v4 9/9] memory: assert MemoryRegionOps callbacks are defined, P J P, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] memory: assert and define MemoryRegionOps callbacks, David Gibson, 2020/08/13
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] memory: assert and define MemoryRegionOps callbacks,
P J P <=
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] memory: assert and define MemoryRegionOps callbacks, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/08/16