[PATCH v3 02/12] block/io.c: drop assertion on double waiting for request serialisation

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

The comments states, that on misaligned request we should have already
been waiting. But for bdrv_padding_rmw_read, we called
bdrv_mark_request_serialising with align = request_alignment, and now
we serialise with align = cluster_size. So we may have to wait again
with larger alignment.

Note, that the only user of BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING is backup which issues
cluster-aligned requests, so seems the assertion should not fire for
now. But it's wrong anyway.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 block/io.c | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index ad3a51ed53..b18680a842 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -1881,7 +1881,6 @@ bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t 
offset, uint64_t bytes,
                           BdrvTrackedRequest *req, int flags)
 {
     BlockDriverState *bs = child->bs;
-    bool waited;
     int64_t end_sector = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + bytes, BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
 
     if (bs->read_only) {
@@ -1893,15 +1892,7 @@ bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t 
offset, uint64_t bytes,
     assert(!(flags & ~BDRV_REQ_MASK));
 
     if (flags & BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING) {
-        waited = bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bdrv_get_cluster_size(bs));
-        /*
-         * For a misaligned request we should have already waited earlier,
-         * because we come after bdrv_padding_rmw_read which must be called
-         * with the request already marked as serialising.
-         */
-        assert(!waited ||
-               (req->offset == req->overlap_offset &&
-                req->bytes == req->overlap_bytes));
+        bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bdrv_get_cluster_size(bs));
     } else {
         bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
     }
-- 
2.18.0