Re: Suspicious QOM types without instance/class size

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:06:51AM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:56 PM Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > While trying to convert TypeInfo declarations to the new
> > OBJECT_DECLARE* macros, I've stumbled on a few suspicious cases
> > where instance_size or class_size is not set, despite having type
> > checker macros that use a specific type.
> >
> > The ones with "WARNING" are abstract types (maybe not serious if
> > subclasses set the appropriate sizes).  The ones with "ERROR"
> > don't seem to be abstract types.
> >
> 
> > ERROR: hw/core/register.c:328:1: instance_size should be set to 
> > sizeof(RegisterInfo)?
> 
> I'll send a patch out for this one today.
> 
> If you are fixing all of these as part of a series I'm also happy to
> just let you do that.

Feel free to send the fix, and I will include it as part of my
series if necessary.

Note that register_init_block() relies on the fact that
register_init() won't touch any RegisterInfo field except
parent_obj, so this won't be a one line patch.

-- 
Eduardo