[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] target/riscv: Add Zihintpause support
From: |
Dao Lu |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] target/riscv: Add Zihintpause support |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2022 08:55:58 -0700 |
That sounds reasonable to me. Will change in the next version.
Thanks,
Dao
On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:13 PM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 2:17 AM Dao Lu <daolu@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > From what I know that's generally the way reservations are handled:
> > if the forward progress requirements aren't met then the implementation
> > is free to break any outstanding reservations (the hardware is always
> > free to do that to a degree, but once forward progress is gone it can
> > always do that). So this is legal, as would be not breaking the
> > reservation.
>
> I'm thinking let's not break the reservation. That way we are
> consistent with the fence instruction. If we do want to clear the
> reservation then we should do it for fence as well.
>
> Alistair
>
> >
> > I don't have a strong opinion on this and am fine about changing it if
> > anyone does.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dao
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 4:39 PM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 2:42 PM Dao Lu <daolu@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Added support for RISC-V PAUSE instruction from Zihintpause extension,
> > > > enabled by default.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dao Lu <daolu@rivosinc.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 ++
> > > > target/riscv/cpu.h | 1 +
> > > > target/riscv/insn32.decode | 7 ++++++-
> > > > target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > index ccacdee215..183fb37fdf 100644
> > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > @@ -825,6 +825,7 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = {
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Counters", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_counters, true),
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zifencei", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_ifencei, true),
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zicsr", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_icsr, true),
> > > > + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zihintpause", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zihintpause,
> > > > true),
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zfh", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zfh, false),
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zfhmin", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zfhmin, false),
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Zve32f", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zve32f, false),
> > > > @@ -996,6 +997,7 @@ static void riscv_isa_string_ext(RISCVCPU *cpu,
> > > > char **isa_str, int max_str_len)
> > > > * extensions by an underscore.
> > > > */
> > > > struct isa_ext_data isa_edata_arr[] = {
> > > > + ISA_EDATA_ENTRY(zihintpause, ext_zihintpause),
> > > > ISA_EDATA_ENTRY(zfh, ext_zfh),
> > > > ISA_EDATA_ENTRY(zfhmin, ext_zfhmin),
> > > > ISA_EDATA_ENTRY(zfinx, ext_zfinx),
> > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > > > index fe6c9a2c92..e466a04a59 100644
> > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > > > @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
> > > > bool ext_counters;
> > > > bool ext_ifencei;
> > > > bool ext_icsr;
> > > > + bool ext_zihintpause;
> > > > bool ext_svinval;
> > > > bool ext_svnapot;
> > > > bool ext_svpbmt;
> > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/insn32.decode b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> > > > index 4033565393..595fdcdad8 100644
> > > > --- a/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> > > > +++ b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> > > > @@ -149,7 +149,12 @@ srl 0000000 ..... ..... 101 ..... 0110011
> > > > @r
> > > > sra 0100000 ..... ..... 101 ..... 0110011 @r
> > > > or 0000000 ..... ..... 110 ..... 0110011 @r
> > > > and 0000000 ..... ..... 111 ..... 0110011 @r
> > > > -fence ---- pred:4 succ:4 ----- 000 ----- 0001111
> > > > +
> > > > +{
> > > > + pause 0000 0001 0000 00000 000 00000 0001111
> > > > + fence ---- pred:4 succ:4 ----- 000 ----- 0001111
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > fence_i ---- ---- ---- ----- 001 ----- 0001111
> > > > csrrw ............ ..... 001 ..... 1110011 @csr
> > > > csrrs ............ ..... 010 ..... 1110011 @csr
> > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> > > > b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> > > > index f1342f30f8..ca75e05f4b 100644
> > > > --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> > > > +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> > > > @@ -796,6 +796,24 @@ static bool trans_srad(DisasContext *ctx, arg_srad
> > > > *a)
> > > > return gen_shift(ctx, a, EXT_SIGN, tcg_gen_sar_tl, NULL);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static bool trans_pause(DisasContext *ctx, arg_pause *a)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zihintpause) {
> > > > + return false;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * PAUSE is a no-op in QEMU,
> > > > + * however we need to clear the reservation,
> > > > + * end the TB and return to main loop
> > > > + */
> > > > + tcg_gen_movi_tl(load_res, -1);
> > >
> > > I'm not clear why we need to clear the load_res? We don't do it for
> > > fence instruction
> > >
> > > Alistair
> > >
> > > > + gen_set_pc_imm(ctx, ctx->pc_succ_insn);
> > > > + tcg_gen_exit_tb(NULL, 0);
> > > > + ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
> > > > +
> > > > + return true;
> > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > static bool trans_fence(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fence *a)
> > > > {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> > > >