qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v4 10/27] tcg/s390x: Remove DISTINCT_OPERANDS facility check


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/27] tcg/s390x: Remove DISTINCT_OPERANDS facility check
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:05:13 -0600

The distinct-operands facility is bundled into facility 45,
along with load-on-condition.  We are checking this at startup.
Remove the a0 == a1 checks for 64-bit sub, and, or, xor, as there
is no space savings for avoiding the distinct-operands insn.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h     |  1 -
 tcg/s390x/tcg-target.c.inc | 16 ++--------------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h b/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h
index fc9ae82700..db10a39381 100644
--- a/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h
+++ b/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.h
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ typedef enum TCGReg {
 
 /* Facilities that are checked at runtime. */
 
-#define FACILITY_DISTINCT_OPS         45
 #define FACILITY_LOAD_ON_COND2        53
 #define FACILITY_VECTOR               129
 #define FACILITY_VECTOR_ENH1          135
diff --git a/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.c.inc
index dd58f0cdb5..e4403ffabf 100644
--- a/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.c.inc
+++ b/tcg/s390x/tcg-target.c.inc
@@ -2218,8 +2218,6 @@ static inline void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode 
opc,
         if (const_args[2]) {
             a2 = -a2;
             goto do_addi_64;
-        } else if (a0 == a1) {
-            tcg_out_insn(s, RRE, SGR, a0, a2);
         } else {
             tcg_out_insn(s, RRF, SGRK, a0, a1, a2);
         }
@@ -2230,8 +2228,6 @@ static inline void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode 
opc,
         if (const_args[2]) {
             tcg_out_mov(s, TCG_TYPE_I64, a0, a1);
             tgen_andi(s, TCG_TYPE_I64, args[0], args[2]);
-        } else if (a0 == a1) {
-            tcg_out_insn(s, RRE, NGR, args[0], args[2]);
         } else {
             tcg_out_insn(s, RRF, NGRK, a0, a1, a2);
         }
@@ -2241,8 +2237,6 @@ static inline void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode 
opc,
         if (const_args[2]) {
             tcg_out_mov(s, TCG_TYPE_I64, a0, a1);
             tgen_ori(s, TCG_TYPE_I64, a0, a2);
-        } else if (a0 == a1) {
-            tcg_out_insn(s, RRE, OGR, a0, a2);
         } else {
             tcg_out_insn(s, RRF, OGRK, a0, a1, a2);
         }
@@ -2252,8 +2246,6 @@ static inline void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode 
opc,
         if (const_args[2]) {
             tcg_out_mov(s, TCG_TYPE_I64, a0, a1);
             tgen_xori(s, TCG_TYPE_I64, a0, a2);
-        } else if (a0 == a1) {
-            tcg_out_insn(s, RRE, XGR, a0, a2);
         } else {
             tcg_out_insn(s, RRF, XGRK, a0, a1, a2);
         }
@@ -2926,9 +2918,7 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode 
op)
     case INDEX_op_or_i64:
     case INDEX_op_xor_i32:
     case INDEX_op_xor_i64:
-        return (HAVE_FACILITY(DISTINCT_OPS)
-                ? C_O1_I2(r, r, ri)
-                : C_O1_I2(r, 0, ri));
+        return C_O1_I2(r, r, ri);
 
     case INDEX_op_mul_i32:
         return C_O1_I2(r, 0, ri);
@@ -2938,9 +2928,7 @@ static TCGConstraintSetIndex tcg_target_op_def(TCGOpcode 
op)
     case INDEX_op_shl_i32:
     case INDEX_op_shr_i32:
     case INDEX_op_sar_i32:
-        return (HAVE_FACILITY(DISTINCT_OPS)
-                ? C_O1_I2(r, r, ri)
-                : C_O1_I2(r, 0, ri));
+        return C_O1_I2(r, r, ri);
 
     case INDEX_op_brcond_i32:
     case INDEX_op_brcond_i64:
-- 
2.34.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]