[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 6/5] include/hw/cxl: Break inclusion loop
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 6/5] include/hw/cxl: Break inclusion loop |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:34:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> writes:
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 08:09:06 +0100
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h and hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h include each other. Neither
>> > header actually needs the other one. Drop both #include directives.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h | 1 -
>> > include/hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h | 1 -
>> > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h
>> > index 7f67638685..e3fd737f9d 100644
>> > --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h
>> > +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h
>> > @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>> > #ifndef CXL_CDAT_H
>> > #define CXL_CDAT_H
>> >
>> > -#include "hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h"
>> > #include "hw/pci/pcie_doe.h"
>
> The include was to get to CXL_VENDOR_ID which is in hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h
> Can move that elsewhere perhaps, though I don't think we need to
> if we break the loop by dropping the other one.
It's used only in a macro. If you use the macro, you need to include
cxl_pci.h.
Would you like me to keep this #include?
>> > /*
>> > diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h
>> > index aca14845ab..01e15ed5b4 100644
>> > --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h
>> > +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h
>> > @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
>> > #define CXL_PCI_H
>> >
>> > #include "qemu/compiler.h"
>> > -#include "hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h"
> Guess that's a left over of some earlier refactoring. Good to get rid
> of this one.
>
>> >
>> > #define CXL_VENDOR_ID 0x1e98
>>
>> Friday afternoon post with insufficient testing... Everything still
>> builds fine, but cxl_component.h is no longer self-contained. I'll
>> squash in the appended patch and revise the commit message.
>
> By staring at the code rather than any automation I'm failing to spot
> what it needs from cxl_pci.h. Can you add that info to the commit message?
It's CXL20_MAX_DVSEC.
>> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_component.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_component.h
>> index 5dca21e95b..78f83ed742 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_component.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_component.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> #include "qemu/range.h"
>> #include "qemu/typedefs.h"
>> #include "hw/cxl/cxl_cdat.h"
>> +#include "hw/cxl/cxl_pci.h"
>> #include "hw/register.h"
>> #include "qapi/error.h"
>>
>>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] include/hw/pci: Clean up superfluous inclusion of pci*/*.h cxl/*.h, (continued)
[PATCH 4/5] include/hw/pci: Split pci_device.h off pci.h, Markus Armbruster, 2022/12/09
[PATCH 6/5] include/hw/cxl: Break inclusion loop, Markus Armbruster, 2022/12/09
Re: [PATCH 0/5] include/hw/pci include/hw/cxl: Clean up includes, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2022/12/21