[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Implement Virtio Backend for SD/MMC in QEMU
From: |
Ми |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Implement Virtio Backend for SD/MMC in QEMU |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:23:31 +0300 |
> 4 июля 2024 г., в 10:38, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> написал(а):
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 10:25:53AM +0300, Mikhail Krasheninnikov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:55:17PM +0300, Mikhail Krasheninnikov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello, Alex!
>>>>
>>>> No, there's no patch to the VirtIO specification yet. This is
>>>> proof-of-concept solution since I'm not sure that I did everything
>>>> correct with the design (and as folks' reviews show, for a good reason).
>>>> As soon as most obvious issues would be out of the way, I think I'll
>>>> submit a patch.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mikhail, if you want people to review your patches but not merge
>>> them yet, pls use an RFC tag in the subject to avoid confusion.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>> MST
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hello, Michael!
>>
>> I was planning to submit three patches: to the kernel, emulator and Virtio
>> specification around the same time - as soon as the obvious bugs are
>> fixed, I'll submit a patch to the specification. I thought it wasn't
>> necessary to use the RFC tag in that case, but if you think it is,
>> I'll include it with the next version of the patch.
>
> RFC means "this is proof of concept". On the one hand some people
> won't bother reviewing then. On the other your patch will be
> judged less harshly. If your code still has debugging printks,
> it's clearly an RFC at best.
>
> --
> MST
>
I apologize for the debug printks in other patch, I’m not really sure
how I gazed over it.. If it makes my situation better, it’s my first series
of patches. I’ll make sure to triple-check next time. Thanks for the
feedback!