[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Implement Virtio Backend for SD/MMC in QEMU
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Implement Virtio Backend for SD/MMC in QEMU |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:38:22 -0400 |
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 10:25:53AM +0300, Mikhail Krasheninnikov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2024, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:55:17PM +0300, Mikhail Krasheninnikov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, Alex!
> > >
> > > No, there's no patch to the VirtIO specification yet. This is
> > > proof-of-concept solution since I'm not sure that I did everything
> > > correct with the design (and as folks' reviews show, for a good reason).
> > > As soon as most obvious issues would be out of the way, I think I'll
> > > submit a patch.
> >
> >
> > Mikhail, if you want people to review your patches but not merge
> > them yet, pls use an RFC tag in the subject to avoid confusion.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > MST
> >
> >
>
> Hello, Michael!
>
> I was planning to submit three patches: to the kernel, emulator and Virtio
> specification around the same time - as soon as the obvious bugs are
> fixed, I'll submit a patch to the specification. I thought it wasn't
> necessary to use the RFC tag in that case, but if you think it is,
> I'll include it with the next version of the patch.
RFC means "this is proof of concept". On the one hand some people
won't bother reviewing then. On the other your patch will be
judged less harshly. If your code still has debugging printks,
it's clearly an RFC at best.
--
MST