qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 03/17] intel_iommu: Add a placeholder variable for scalabl


From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/17] intel_iommu: Add a placeholder variable for scalable modern mode
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:02:22 +0000


On 18/07/2024 10:16, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this 
> email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe.
>
>
> Add an new element scalable_mode in IntelIOMMUState to mark scalable
> modern mode, this element will be exposed as an intel_iommu property
> finally.
>
> For now, it's only a placehholder and used for cap/ecap initialization,
> compatibility check and block host device passthrough until nesting
> is supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> ---
>   hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h |  2 ++
>   include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h  |  1 +
>   hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> index c0ca7b372f..4e0331caba 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@
>   #define VTD_ECAP_PASID              (1ULL << 40)
>   #define VTD_ECAP_SMTS               (1ULL << 43)
>   #define VTD_ECAP_SLTS               (1ULL << 46)
> +#define VTD_ECAP_FLTS               (1ULL << 47)
>
>   /* CAP_REG */
>   /* (offset >> 4) << 24 */
> @@ -211,6 +212,7 @@
>   #define VTD_CAP_SLLPS               ((1ULL << 34) | (1ULL << 35))
>   #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN_WRITE         (1ULL << 54)
>   #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN_READ          (1ULL << 55)
> +#define VTD_CAP_FS1GP               (1ULL << 56)
>   #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN               (VTD_CAP_DRAIN_READ | 
> VTD_CAP_DRAIN_WRITE)
>   #define VTD_CAP_CM                  (1ULL << 7)
>   #define VTD_PASID_ID_SHIFT          20
> diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> index 1eb05c29fc..788ed42477 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h
> @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState {
>
>       bool caching_mode;              /* RO - is cap CM enabled? */
>       bool scalable_mode;             /* RO - is Scalable Mode supported? */
> +    bool scalable_modern;           /* RO - is modern SM supported? */
>       bool snoop_control;             /* RO - is SNP filed supported? */
>
>       dma_addr_t root;                /* Current root table pointer */
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 1cff8b00ae..40cbd4a0f4 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -755,16 +755,20 @@ static inline bool 
> vtd_is_level_supported(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint32_t level)
>   }
>
>   /* Return true if check passed, otherwise false */
> -static inline bool vtd_pe_type_check(X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu,
> -                                     VTDPASIDEntry *pe)
> +static inline bool vtd_pe_type_check(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDPASIDEntry *pe)
>   {
What about using the cap/ecap registers to know if the translation types 
are supported or not.
Otherwise, we could add a comment to explain why we expect 
s->scalable_modern to give us enough information.
> +    X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
> +
>       switch (VTD_PE_GET_TYPE(pe)) {
> +    case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_FLT:
> +        return s->scalable_modern;
>       case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_SLT:
> -        return true;
> +        return !s->scalable_modern;
> +    case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_NESTED:
> +        /* Not support NESTED page table type yet */
> +        return false;
>       case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_PT:
>           return x86_iommu->pt_supported;
> -    case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_FLT:
> -    case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_NESTED:
>       default:
>           /* Unknown type */
>           return false;
> @@ -813,7 +817,6 @@ static int vtd_get_pe_in_pasid_leaf_table(IntelIOMMUState 
> *s,
>       uint8_t pgtt;
>       uint32_t index;
>       dma_addr_t entry_size;
> -    X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s);
>
>       index = VTD_PASID_TABLE_INDEX(pasid);
>       entry_size = VTD_PASID_ENTRY_SIZE;
> @@ -827,7 +830,7 @@ static int vtd_get_pe_in_pasid_leaf_table(IntelIOMMUState 
> *s,
>       }
>
>       /* Do translation type check */
> -    if (!vtd_pe_type_check(x86_iommu, pe)) {
> +    if (!vtd_pe_type_check(s, pe)) {
>           return -VTD_FR_PASID_TABLE_ENTRY_INV;
>       }
>
> @@ -3861,7 +3864,13 @@ static bool vtd_check_hiod(IntelIOMMUState *s, 
> HostIOMMUDevice *hiod,
>           return false;
>       }
>
> -    return true;
> +    if (!s->scalable_modern) {
> +        /* All checks requested by VTD non-modern mode pass */
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +
> +    error_setg(errp, "host device is unsupported in scalable modern mode 
> yet");
> +    return false;
>   }
>
>   static bool vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn,
> @@ -4084,7 +4093,10 @@ static void vtd_cap_init(IntelIOMMUState *s)
>       }
>
>       /* TODO: read cap/ecap from host to decide which cap to be exposed. */
> -    if (s->scalable_mode) {
> +    if (s->scalable_modern) {
> +        s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_SMTS | VTD_ECAP_FLTS;
> +        s->cap |= VTD_CAP_FS1GP;
> +    } else if (s->scalable_mode) {
>           s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_SMTS | VTD_ECAP_SRS | VTD_ECAP_SLTS;
>       }
>
> @@ -4251,9 +4263,9 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error 
> **errp)
>           }
>       }
>
> -    /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */
>       if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT) &&
> -        (s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT)) {
> +        (s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT) &&
> +        !s->scalable_modern) {
>           error_setg(errp, "Supported values for aw-bits are: %d, %d",
>                      VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT, VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT);
>           return false;
> --
> 2.34.1
>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]