|
From: | Yi Liu |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v1 03/17] intel_iommu: Add a placeholder variable for scalable modern mode |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:22:46 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 2024/7/19 10:47, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/17] intel_iommu: Add a placeholder variable for scalable modern mode On 18/07/2024 10:16, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless thisemail comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe.Add an new element scalable_mode in IntelIOMMUState to mark scalable modern mode, this element will be exposed as an intel_iommu property finally. For now, it's only a placehholder and used for cap/ecap initialization, compatibility check and block host device passthrough until nesting is supported. Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com> --- hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 2 ++ include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 1 + hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.hb/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.hindex c0ca7b372f..4e0331caba 100644 --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ #define VTD_ECAP_PASID (1ULL << 40) #define VTD_ECAP_SMTS (1ULL << 43) #define VTD_ECAP_SLTS (1ULL << 46) +#define VTD_ECAP_FLTS (1ULL << 47) /* CAP_REG */ /* (offset >> 4) << 24 */ @@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ #define VTD_CAP_SLLPS ((1ULL << 34) | (1ULL << 35)) #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN_WRITE (1ULL << 54) #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN_READ (1ULL << 55) +#define VTD_CAP_FS1GP (1ULL << 56) #define VTD_CAP_DRAIN (VTD_CAP_DRAIN_READ |VTD_CAP_DRAIN_WRITE)#define VTD_CAP_CM (1ULL << 7) #define VTD_PASID_ID_SHIFT 20 diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.hb/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.hindex 1eb05c29fc..788ed42477 100644 --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState { bool caching_mode; /* RO - is cap CM enabled? */ bool scalable_mode; /* RO - is Scalable Mode supported? */ + bool scalable_modern; /* RO - is modern SM supported? */ bool snoop_control; /* RO - is SNP filed supported? */ dma_addr_t root; /* Current root table pointer */ diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c index 1cff8b00ae..40cbd4a0f4 100644 --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c @@ -755,16 +755,20 @@ static inline boolvtd_is_level_supported(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint32_t level)} /* Return true if check passed, otherwise false */ -static inline bool vtd_pe_type_check(X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu, - VTDPASIDEntry *pe) +static inline bool vtd_pe_type_check(IntelIOMMUState *s,VTDPASIDEntry *pe){What about using the cap/ecap registers to know if the translation types are supported or not. Otherwise, we could add a comment to explain why we expect s->scalable_modern to give us enough information.What about below: /* *VTD_ECAP_FLTS in ecap is set if s->scalable_modern is true, or else VTD_ECAP_SLTS can be set or not depending on s->scalable_mode. *So it's simpler to check s->scalable_modern directly for a PASID entry type instead ecap bits. */
Since this helper is for pasid entry check, so you can just return false if the pe's PGTT is SS-only. It might make more sense to check the ecap/cap here as anyhow the capability is listed in ecap/cap. This may also bring us some convenience. Say in the future, if we want to add a new mode (e.g. scalable mode 2.0) that supports both FS and SS for guest, we may need to update this helper as well if we check the scalable_modern. But if we check the ecap/cap, then the future change just needs to control the ecap/cap setting at the beginning of the vIOMMU init. To keep the code aligned, you may need to check ecap.PT bit for VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_PT. :)
+ X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s); + switch (VTD_PE_GET_TYPE(pe)) { + case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_FLT: + return s->scalable_modern; case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_SLT: - return true; + return !s->scalable_modern; + case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_NESTED: + /* Not support NESTED page table type yet */ + return false; case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_PT: return x86_iommu->pt_supported; - case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_FLT: - case VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_NESTED: default: /* Unknown type */ return false; @@ -813,7 +817,6 @@ static intvtd_get_pe_in_pasid_leaf_table(IntelIOMMUState *s,uint8_t pgtt; uint32_t index; dma_addr_t entry_size; - X86IOMMUState *x86_iommu = X86_IOMMU_DEVICE(s); index = VTD_PASID_TABLE_INDEX(pasid); entry_size = VTD_PASID_ENTRY_SIZE; @@ -827,7 +830,7 @@ static intvtd_get_pe_in_pasid_leaf_table(IntelIOMMUState *s,} /* Do translation type check */ - if (!vtd_pe_type_check(x86_iommu, pe)) { + if (!vtd_pe_type_check(s, pe)) { return -VTD_FR_PASID_TABLE_ENTRY_INV; } @@ -3861,7 +3864,13 @@ static bool vtd_check_hiod(IntelIOMMUState*s, HostIOMMUDevice *hiod,return false; } - return true; + if (!s->scalable_modern) { + /* All checks requested by VTD non-modern mode pass */ + return true; + } + + error_setg(errp, "host device is unsupported in scalable modern modeyet");+ return false; } static bool vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, intdevfn,@@ -4084,7 +4093,10 @@ static void vtd_cap_init(IntelIOMMUState *s) } /* TODO: read cap/ecap from host to decide which cap to be exposed.*/- if (s->scalable_mode) { + if (s->scalable_modern) { + s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_SMTS | VTD_ECAP_FLTS; + s->cap |= VTD_CAP_FS1GP; + } else if (s->scalable_mode) { s->ecap |= VTD_ECAP_SMTS | VTD_ECAP_SRS | VTD_ECAP_SLTS; } @@ -4251,9 +4263,9 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState*s, Error **errp)} } - /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */ if ((s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT) && - (s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT)) { + (s->aw_bits != VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT) && + !s->scalable_modern) { error_setg(errp, "Supported values for aw-bits are: %d, %d", VTD_HOST_AW_39BIT, VTD_HOST_AW_48BIT); return false; -- 2.34.1
-- Regards, Yi Liu
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |