[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] virtio: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER property definition
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] virtio: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER property definition |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jul 2024 15:16:26 -0400 |
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 08:55:19AM -0400, Jonah Palmer wrote:
> Extend the virtio device property definitions to include the
> VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER feature.
>
> The default state of this feature is disabled, allowing it to be
> explicitly enabled where it's supported.
>
> Acked-by: Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonah Palmer <jonah.palmer@oracle.com>
Given release is close, it's likely wise.
However, I think we should flip the default in the future
release.
> ---
> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> index fdc827f82e..d2a1938757 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> @@ -373,7 +373,9 @@ typedef struct VirtIORNGConf VirtIORNGConf;
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("packed", _state, _field, \
> VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED, false), \
> DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("queue_reset", _state, _field, \
> - VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET, true)
> + VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET, true), \
> + DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("in_order", _state, _field, \
> + VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER, false)
>
> hwaddr virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> bool virtio_queue_enabled_legacy(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> --
> 2.43.5
- [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio,vhost: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support, Jonah Palmer, 2024/07/10
- [PATCH v4 3/6] virtio: virtqueue_ordered_fill - VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support, Jonah Palmer, 2024/07/10
- [PATCH v4 2/6] virtio: virtqueue_pop - VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support, Jonah Palmer, 2024/07/10
- [PATCH v4 4/6] virtio: virtqueue_ordered_flush - VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support, Jonah Palmer, 2024/07/10
- [PATCH v4 5/6] vhost, vhost-user: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER to vhost feature bits, Jonah Palmer, 2024/07/10