Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] virtio: Add VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER property definition

[Eugenio Perez Martin]

On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 9:16 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 08:55:19AM -0400, Jonah Palmer wrote:
> > Extend the virtio device property definitions to include the
> > VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER feature.
> >
> > The default state of this feature is disabled, allowing it to be
> > explicitly enabled where it's supported.
> >
> > Acked-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jonah Palmer <jonah.palmer@oracle.com>
>
>
> Given release is close, it's likely wise.
> However, I think we should flip the default in the future
> release.
>

Should we post a new version with v9.2 tag enabling it?

> > ---
> >  include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> > index fdc827f82e..d2a1938757 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> > @@ -373,7 +373,9 @@ typedef struct VirtIORNGConf VirtIORNGConf;
> >      DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("packed", _state, _field, \
> >                        VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED, false), \
> >      DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("queue_reset", _state, _field, \
> > -                      VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET, true)
> > +                      VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET, true), \
> > +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("in_order", _state, _field, \
> > +                      VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER, false)
> >
> >  hwaddr virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> >  bool virtio_queue_enabled_legacy(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> > --
> > 2.43.5
>