qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PADID-selective


From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PADID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 05:16:56 +0000


On 24/07/2024 04:59, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
> Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this 
> email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CLEMENT MATHIEU--DRIF <clement.mathieu--drif@eviden.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/17] intel_iommu: Flush stage-2 cache in PADID-
>> selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18/07/2024 10:16, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this
>> email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe.
>>>
>>> Per spec 6.5.2.4, PADID-selective PASID-based iotlb invalidation will
>>> flush stage-2 iotlb entries with matching domain id and pasid.
>>>
>>> With scalable modern mode introduced, guest could send PASID-selective
>>> PASID-based iotlb invalidation to flush both stage-1 and stage-2 entries.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 10 +++++
>>>    hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 78
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>>> index 4e0331caba..f71fc91234 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>>> @@ -440,6 +440,16 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
>>>            (0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM |
>> VTD_SL_TM)) : \
>>>            (0x3ffff800ULL | ~(VTD_HAW_MASK(aw) | VTD_SL_IGN_COM))
>>>
>>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_ALL_IN_PASID  (2ULL << 4)
>>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PSI_IN_PASID  (3ULL << 4)
>>> +
>>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL0     0xfff000000000ffc0ULL
>>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL1     0xf80ULL
>>> +
>>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PASID(val)    (((val) >> 32) & 0xfffffULL)
>>> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_DID(val)      (((val) >> 16) & \
>>> +                                             VTD_DOMAIN_ID_MASK)
>>> +
>>>    /* Information about page-selective IOTLB invalidate */
>>>    struct VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo {
>>>        uint16_t domain_id;
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> index 40cbd4a0f4..075a27adac 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>>> @@ -2659,6 +2659,80 @@ static bool
>> vtd_process_iotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s, VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
>>>        return true;
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +static gboolean vtd_hash_remove_by_pasid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
>>> +                                         gpointer user_data)
>>> +{
>>> +    VTDIOTLBEntry *entry = (VTDIOTLBEntry *)value;
>>> +    VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo *info = (VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo *)user_data;
>>> +
>>> +    return ((entry->domain_id == info->domain_id) &&
>>> +            (entry->pasid == info->pasid));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void vtd_piotlb_pasid_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>>> +                                        uint16_t domain_id, uint32_t pasid)
>>> +{
>>> +    VTDIOTLBPageInvInfo info;
>>> +    VTDAddressSpace *vtd_as;
>>> +    VTDContextEntry ce;
>>> +
>>> +    info.domain_id = domain_id;
>>> +    info.pasid = pasid;
>>> +
>>> +    vtd_iommu_lock(s);
>>> +    g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, vtd_hash_remove_by_pasid,
>>> +                                &info);
>>> +    vtd_iommu_unlock(s);
>>> +
>>> +    QLIST_FOREACH(vtd_as, &s->vtd_as_with_notifiers, next) {
>>> +        if (!vtd_dev_to_context_entry(s, pci_bus_num(vtd_as->bus),
>>> +                                      vtd_as->devfn, &ce) &&
>>> +            domain_id == vtd_get_domain_id(s, &ce, vtd_as->pasid)) {
>>> +            uint32_t rid2pasid = VTD_CE_GET_RID2PASID(&ce);
>>> +
>>> +            if ((vtd_as->pasid != PCI_NO_PASID || pasid != rid2pasid) &&
>>> +                vtd_as->pasid != pasid) {
>>> +                continue;
>>> +            }
>>> +
>>> +            if (!s->scalable_modern) {
>>> +                vtd_address_space_sync(vtd_as);
>>> +            }
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static bool vtd_process_piotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>>> +                                    VTDInvDesc *inv_desc)
>>> +{
>>> +    uint16_t domain_id;
>>> +    uint32_t pasid;
>>> +
>>> +    if ((inv_desc->val[0] & VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL0) ||
>>> +        (inv_desc->val[1] & VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL1)) {
>>> +        error_report_once("non-zero-field-in-piotlb_inv_desc hi: 0x%"
>> PRIx64
>>> +                  " lo: 0x%" PRIx64, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0]);
>> This error is not formatted as the other similar messages we print when
>> reserved bits are non-zero.
>> Here is what we've done in vtd_process_iotlb_desc:
> Sure, will change as below,
>
>>          error_report_once("%s: invalid iotlb inv desc: hi=0x%"PRIx64
>>                            ", lo=0x%"PRIx64" (reserved bits unzero)",
>>                            __func__, inv_desc->hi, inv_desc->lo);
>>> +        return false;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    domain_id = VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_DID(inv_desc->val[0]);
>>> +    pasid = VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PASID(inv_desc->val[0]);
>>> +    switch (inv_desc->val[0] & VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_G) {
>> Not critical but why don't we have VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_G?
> Will add.
>
>>> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_ALL_IN_PASID:
>>> +        vtd_piotlb_pasid_invalidate(s, domain_id, pasid);
>>> +        break;
>>> +
>>> +    case VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PSI_IN_PASID:
>>> +        break;
>>> +
>>> +    default:
>>> +        error_report_once("Invalid granularity in P-IOTLB desc hi: 0x%"
>> PRIx64
>>> +                  " lo: 0x%" PRIx64, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0]);
>> Same comment, I think we should make the messages consistent across
>> descriptor handlers.
> What about below:
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> index 3290761595..e76fd9d377 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
> @@ -479,9 +479,10 @@ typedef union VTDInvDesc VTDInvDesc;
>   #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_ALL_IN_PASID  (2ULL << 4)
>   #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PSI_IN_PASID  (3ULL << 4)
>
> +/* Masks for IOTLB Invalidate Descriptor */
> +#define VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_G              (3ULL << 4)
This one is already defined
>   #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL0     0xfff000000000ffc0ULL
>   #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL1     0xf80ULL
> -
>   #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_PASID(val)    (((val) >> 32) & 0xfffffULL)
>   #define VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_DID(val)      (((val) >> 16) & \
>                                                VTD_DOMAIN_ID_MASK)
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 0733180501..9dd41b835b 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -3708,8 +3708,9 @@ static bool vtd_process_piotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>
>       if ((inv_desc->val[0] & VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL0) ||
>           (inv_desc->val[1] & VTD_INV_DESC_PIOTLB_RSVD_VAL1)) {
> -        error_report_once("non-zero-field-in-piotlb_inv_desc hi: 0x%" PRIx64
> -                  " lo: 0x%" PRIx64, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0]);
> +        error_report_once("%s: invalid piotlb inv desc hi=0x%"PRIx64
> +                          " lo=0x%"PRIx64" (reserved bits unzero)",
> +                          __func__, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0]);
>           return false;
>       }
lgtm
>
> @@ -3728,8 +3729,10 @@ static bool vtd_process_piotlb_desc(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>           break;
>
>       default:
> -        error_report_once("Invalid granularity in P-IOTLB desc hi: 0x%" 
> PRIx64
> -                  " lo: 0x%" PRIx64, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0]);
> +        error_report_once("%s: invalid piotlb inv desc: hi=0x%"PRIx64
> +                          ", lo=0x%"PRIx64" (type mismatch: 0x%llx)",
> +                          __func__, inv_desc->val[1], inv_desc->val[0],
> +                          inv_desc->val[0] & VTD_INV_DESC_IOTLB_G);
>           return false;
>       }
>       return true;
lgtm
>
> Thanks
> Zhenzhong
Thanks
 >cmd

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]