Re: [PATCH 1/1] MAINTAINERS: update email addr for Brian Cain

[Peter Maydell]

On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 14:23, Brian Cain <brian.cain@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/2/2024 2:43 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 23/11/24 17:46, Brian Cain wrote:
> >> From: Brian Cain <brian.cain@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >>
> >> Also: add mapping for "quic_bcain@quicinc.com" which was ~briefly
> >> used for some replies to mailing list traffic.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Brian Cain <brian.cain@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >> ---
> >>   .mailmap    | 2 ++
> >>   MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> >>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> >
> Forgive my ignorance here -- this T-b is - stronger than a R-b? or
> weaker than a R-b?  Or wholly orthogonal to R-b?

They mean different things -- T-b says "I tested this patch
and it works for me", and R-b says "I looked at the code
change and think it's a good change with no bugs".

T-b is a slightly odd thing to have on a MAINTAINERS
change, though I'm guessing Philippe might mean they tested
that the .mailmap change affected the commits the way it
was supposed to.

> Should I still seek a R-b before making a pull request with this change?

Philippe put this into his pullreq he just sent out, so you
don't need to do anything more on your end.

thanks
-- PMM