On 3/12/24 15:31, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 14:23, Brian Cain <brian.cain@oss.qualcomm.com>
wrote:
On 12/2/2024 2:43 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 23/11/24 17:46, Brian Cain wrote:
From: Brian Cain <brian.cain@oss.qualcomm.com>
Also: add mapping for "quic_bcain@quicinc.com" which was ~briefly
used for some replies to mailing list traffic.
Signed-off-by: Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Cain <brian.cain@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
.mailmap | 2 ++
MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Forgive my ignorance here -- this T-b is - stronger than a R-b? or
weaker than a R-b? Or wholly orthogonal to R-b?
They mean different things -- T-b says "I tested this patch
and it works for me", and R-b says "I looked at the code
change and think it's a good change with no bugs".
T-b is a slightly odd thing to have on a MAINTAINERS
change, though I'm guessing Philippe might mean they tested
that the .mailmap change affected the commits the way it
was supposed to.
I tested oss.qualcomm.com is a valid MX and we can send
emails to it.
Then I looked at the recent github changes from quicinc
around oss.qualcomm.com, and that this email was posted
from your bcain@quicinc.com address. For that I could have
used a R-b tag I guess 🤷