|
From: | Thomas Huth |
Subject: | Re: [PULL 00/15] Host Memory Backends and Memory devices queue 2024-12-18 |
Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2024 13:20:46 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 19/12/2024 12.57, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 19.12.24 12:43, Christian Borntraeger wrote:Am 19.12.24 um 12:18 schrieb David Hildenbrand:The following on top seems to make everything happy. I wish the CONFIG_S390_CCW_VIRTIO stuff would't have to be so complicated, just to handle odd configs that don't really make sense.WOuld it be possible to rid of this config?I was asking myself the same: when does it make sense to build for s390x system without CONFIG_S390_CCW_VIRTIO. But other archs that also have a single machine seem to be doing the same thing.We wouldn't want to have the option to disable it, but "bool" gives you the option to do that.
Since a while, (almost) all targets can be compiled without any machine except for the "none" machine, so I think we should not diverge in the s390x just for the sake of it.
Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |