qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: rvzicbo: Fixup CBO extension register calculat


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: rvzicbo: Fixup CBO extension register calculation
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 15:09:57 +1000

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 7:11 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/13/24 23:39, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > When running the instruction
> >
> > ```
> >      cbo.flush 0(x0)
> > ```
> >
> > QEMU would segfault.
> >
> > The issue was in cpu_gpr[a->rs1] as QEMU does not have cpu_gpr[0]
> > allocated.
> >
> > In order to fix this let's use the existing get_address()
> > helper. This also has the benefit of performing pointer mask
> > calculations on the address specified in rs1.
> >
> > The pointer masking specificiation specifically states:
> >
> > """
> > Cache Management Operations: All instructions in Zicbom, Zicbop and Zicboz
> > """
> >
> > So this is the correct behaviour and we previously have been incorrectly
> > not masking the address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > Reported-by: Fabian Thomas <fabian.thomas@cispa.de>
> > Fixes: e05da09b7cfd ("target/riscv: implement Zicbom extension")
> > ---
>
> LGTM but I wonder if this is the same fix as this one sent by Phil a month
> ago or so:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20240419110514.69697-1-philmd@linaro.org/
> ("[PATCH] target/riscv: Use get_address() to get address with Zicbom 
> extensions")

It is the same fix!

I somehow missed that patch at the time. Sorry Philippe!

I'm going to merge this one as it includes the details about pointer
masking, which I think is useful as that's why we are using
get_address() instead of get_gpr()

Alistair

>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
> >   target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzicbo.c.inc | 16 ++++++++++++----
> >   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzicbo.c.inc 
> > b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzicbo.c.inc
> > index d5d7095903..15711c3140 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzicbo.c.inc
> > +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzicbo.c.inc
> > @@ -31,27 +31,35 @@
> >   static bool trans_cbo_clean(DisasContext *ctx, arg_cbo_clean *a)
> >   {
> >       REQUIRE_ZICBOM(ctx);
> > -    gen_helper_cbo_clean_flush(tcg_env, cpu_gpr[a->rs1]);
> > +    TCGv src = get_address(ctx, a->rs1, 0);
> > +
> > +    gen_helper_cbo_clean_flush(tcg_env, src);
> >       return true;
> >   }
> >
> >   static bool trans_cbo_flush(DisasContext *ctx, arg_cbo_flush *a)
> >   {
> >       REQUIRE_ZICBOM(ctx);
> > -    gen_helper_cbo_clean_flush(tcg_env, cpu_gpr[a->rs1]);
> > +    TCGv src = get_address(ctx, a->rs1, 0);
> > +
> > +    gen_helper_cbo_clean_flush(tcg_env, src);
> >       return true;
> >   }
> >
> >   static bool trans_cbo_inval(DisasContext *ctx, arg_cbo_inval *a)
> >   {
> >       REQUIRE_ZICBOM(ctx);
> > -    gen_helper_cbo_inval(tcg_env, cpu_gpr[a->rs1]);
> > +    TCGv src = get_address(ctx, a->rs1, 0);
> > +
> > +    gen_helper_cbo_inval(tcg_env, src);
> >       return true;
> >   }
> >
> >   static bool trans_cbo_zero(DisasContext *ctx, arg_cbo_zero *a)
> >   {
> >       REQUIRE_ZICBOZ(ctx);
> > -    gen_helper_cbo_zero(tcg_env, cpu_gpr[a->rs1]);
> > +    TCGv src = get_address(ctx, a->rs1, 0);
> > +
> > +    gen_helper_cbo_zero(tcg_env, src);
> >       return true;
> >   }



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]