qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/5] target/riscv: Support the version for ss1p13


From: Fea Wang
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/5] target/riscv: Support the version for ss1p13
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 11:39:47 +0800

Got it.
I will fix it in the next version of the patch series.

Sincerely,
Fea

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:56 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 10:46 AM Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:02 PM Fea.Wang <fea.wang@sifive.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add RISC-V privilege 1.13 support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fea.Wang <fea.wang@sifive.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> > Reviewed-by:  Weiwei Li <liwei1518@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Whoops, ignore this.

>
> Alistair
>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/cpu.c         | 6 +++++-
> >  target/riscv/cpu.h         | 4 +++-
> >  target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h     | 1 +
> >  target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c | 4 ++++
> >  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > index 6dd3d7f4a3..ee2ec4c4e5 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > @@ -1775,7 +1775,9 @@ static int priv_spec_from_str(const char *priv_spec_str)
> >  {
> >      int priv_version = -1;
> >
> > -    if (!g_strcmp0(priv_spec_str, PRIV_VER_1_12_0_STR)) {
> > +    if (!g_strcmp0(priv_spec_str, PRIV_VER_1_13_0_STR)) {
> > +        priv_version = PRIV_VERSION_1_13_0;
> > +    } else if (!g_strcmp0(priv_spec_str, PRIV_VER_1_12_0_STR)) {

This patch should be split in half. We only want to expose this to
user after it has been implemented.

Alistair

> >          priv_version = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0;
> >      } else if (!g_strcmp0(priv_spec_str, PRIV_VER_1_11_0_STR)) {
> >          priv_version = PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0;
> > @@ -1795,6 +1797,8 @@ const char *priv_spec_to_str(int priv_version)
> >          return PRIV_VER_1_11_0_STR;
> >      case PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0:
> >          return PRIV_VER_1_12_0_STR;
> > +    case PRIV_VERSION_1_13_0:
> > +        return PRIV_VER_1_13_0_STR;
> >      default:
> >          return NULL;
> >      }
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > index 140eb43fcb..f691c7d828 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> > @@ -96,12 +96,14 @@ extern RISCVCPUProfile *riscv_profiles[];
> >  #define PRIV_VER_1_10_0_STR "v1.10.0"
> >  #define PRIV_VER_1_11_0_STR "v1.11.0"
> >  #define PRIV_VER_1_12_0_STR "v1.12.0"
> > +#define PRIV_VER_1_13_0_STR "v1.13.0"
> >  enum {
> >      PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0 = 0,
> >      PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0,
> >      PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0,
> > +    PRIV_VERSION_1_13_0,
> >
> > -    PRIV_VERSION_LATEST = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0,
> > +    PRIV_VERSION_LATEST = PRIV_VERSION_1_13_0,
> >  };
> >
> >  #define VEXT_VERSION_1_00_0 0x00010000
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> > index e1e4f32698..fb7eebde52 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_cfg.h
> > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {
> >       * TCG always implement/can't be user disabled,
> >       * based on spec version.
> >       */
> > +    bool has_priv_1_13;
> >      bool has_priv_1_12;
> >      bool has_priv_1_11;
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > index fa186093fb..f53422d605 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
> > @@ -318,6 +318,10 @@ static void riscv_cpu_update_named_features(RISCVCPU *cpu)
> >          cpu->cfg.has_priv_1_12 = true;
> >      }
> >
> > +    if (cpu->env.priv_ver >= PRIV_VERSION_1_13_0) {
> > +        cpu->cfg.has_priv_1_13 = true;
> > +    }
> > +
> >      /* zic64b is 1.12 or later */
> >      cpu->cfg.ext_zic64b = cpu->cfg.cbom_blocksize == 64 &&
> >                            cpu->cfg.cbop_blocksize == 64 &&
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
> >

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]