[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.4
From: |
Jean Delvare |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43? |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:54:16 +0100 |
Hi Andreas, John,
[John Vandenberg]
> > The attached patch fixes the problem.
>
> > Sun awk does not like ~ syntax. Also, the commands
> > need to be reordered otherwise /^$/ causes it to
> > bail out too early.
[Andreas Grünbacher]
> I don't understand the reorder issue, and neither the $ in /^[a-z]+:[ $\t]/.
Neither do I.
While checking the original code and John's replacement proposal, I
found that the original code doesn't seem to work for me:
/^$/ { exit (!mh || not_mh) }
END { exit (!mh || not_mh) }
{ if ($0 ~ /^[a-z]+:[ \t]/i)
mh = 1
else
not_mh = 1
}
The "i" modifier after the regular expression doesn't work as expected,
and seems to confuse gawk (3.1.5). In fact there is no way I could get
the code snippet above to exit with success (0). Replacing
/^[a-z]+:[ \t]/i with /^[A-Za-z]+:[ \t]/ made it work somewhat. But
even then I'm not sure it does what we want it to do. Isn't a line like:
Reply-To: address@hidden
supposed to match the regular expression? It doesn't at the moment,
because we don't allow dashes.
So now I wonder, does the original code actually work for anyone?
John, are you sure that the ~ construct, and not that trailing i, was
confusing Sun's awk? According to my awk reference, ~ is a pretty
standard construct.
Anyway, this code seems to be overly complicated in the first place.
What about this instead:
/^$/ { exit }
END { exit (not_mh) }
!/^[A-Za-z-]+:[ \t]/ { not_mh=1 ; exit }
Works for me and should be totally portable. John, can you please test
with Sun's /usr/xpg4/bin/awk for confirmation?
Note that the attached patch breaks the test suite. My analysis is that
the old awk code didn't work, and this hid a different bug in mail.in,
which we will now have to hunt for.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
quilt-fix-awk-in-mail.patch
Description: Text document
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, (continued)
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/02/01
- [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Jean Delvare, 2006/02/01
- [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Jean Delvare, 2006/02/01
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, John Vandenberg, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Jean Delvare, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, John Vandenberg, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?,
Jean Delvare <=
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Jean Delvare, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Jean Delvare, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Jean Delvare, 2006/02/03
Re: [Quilt-dev] Re: ftw removed; emacs mode; translations; ready for 0.43?, Andreas Gruenbacher, 2006/02/01